Starlink High Performance Flat Dish vs Standard Actuated: Power, Throughput, and Mobile Use

When comparing the Starlink high performance flat dish to the standard actuated dish, there are several key factors to consider. These include power consumption, data throughput, and suitability for mobile use.

Power Consumption

The primary difference in power consumption between the two dishes lies in their design. The flat dish is a fixed installation, meaning it does not require any motors or actuators to orient itself towards satellites. This eliminates the power required to operate these components, resulting in lower overall power consumption.

On the other hand, the standard actuated dish utilizes motors and actuators to adjust its position based on user input or automatically through software. While this allows for more flexibility in installation and orientation, it also increases power requirements due to the continuous operation of motors.

Power Consumption Comparison:

• Flat Dish: 50W (typical)
• Actuated Dish: 70W (typical)

Data Throughput

Both dishes utilize the same Starlink network, which means that data throughput is not directly affected by the choice between a flat dish or an actuated dish. However, factors such as the quality of the dish’s installation and its ability to maintain a clear line-of-sight with satellites can impact overall performance.

Data Throughput: Up to 1Gbps (downstream), depending on network congestion and weather conditions

Mobile Use

The flat dish is not designed for mobile use, as it requires a fixed installation to maintain a stable connection. The actuated dish, however, offers more flexibility in terms of mobile installations. Its ability to adjust its orientation allows for better connectivity when the user is moving or in areas with obstructions.

Mobile Suitability:

• Flat Dish: Not suitable
• Actuated Dish: Suitable

📊 CCTV System Design Reference Infographic